Don't you think you are being a bit too biased in this case? There are academic writers out there who are just starting in the business and are looking for a client to get them started. They would not have any work history or writing samples to present when asked. Does that mean they are bad writers? No. It's not bias and it's very good advice. First, what you have to understand is that MOST writers and essay companies are scams to one degree or another. This just isn't a normal industry with any kind of regulation in which scam artists are the exception rather than the norm. So, trying someone without a long verifiable history (such as 10+ years on the same forum under the same ID) is very risky. About the only thing that clients can do to greatly reduce their risks is find a writer who has invested many years into his or her reputation under a single ID on multiple platforms. Trusting someone without a long history under the same ID is extremely risky, with respect to BOTH getting ripped off and receiving unusably bad work for your hard-earned money.
What if they can deliver as promised but cannot prove that because they do not have any work to present for evaluation? How will these writers get their start? Have you forgotten what is was like starting out in this business and crying out for a chance to prove yourself? This is unfair. We should all get a fair shot at working on this paper. Do not forget that in the form of employment, getting the chance to prove your worth is the hardest to achieve because of the pre-judgement attached to new or inexperienced employees. That should not be the main basis of hiring a writer. Second, clients really care only about one thing: making the best possible choice for the greatest chance of receiving exactly what they need and the least possible chance of getting ripped off or of receiving unusable junk. Clients aren't in the business of providing "opportunities" for brand new writers, because their main concern is their projects, not the career goals of someone they don't even know who decided to try being an academic writer.
Nobody really wants to be a surgeon's first patient, either; and when you're dealing with surgeons, you know, at the very least, that the new surgeon has actually graduated from medical school, completed a residency, and satisfied various highly regulated testing and licensing standards. Even then, plenty of patients avoid teaching hospitals, precisely because they just don't want their surgeries to part of someone else's training. That's just not the case with academic writers, at all. Aside from the outright scammers, MOST people who think they might be able to earn a living doing this quickly find out that they actually can't research and write well enough and fast enough to do this for a living, and that holds true for both new independent writers and newly hired essay company writers. The chances of a bad outcome for clients skyrockets anytime they're dealing with an unproven writer and plummets anytime they're dealing with a more established writer. Your career goals and desire for more work just aren't their concern or their problem; and it's not their obligation to help you get started as a writer.
If you want a realistic way of becoming an academic writer, you should try the path that almost ALL of us who have done this successfully have had to take. That means first getting yourself hired by an essay company, and taking whatever freelance work you might get while working mainly for an essay company. |