Methods of Promoting Academic Integrity in Schools
EssayChat / Jan 11, 2024
Just like inventions, expression of original knowledge is considered intellectual asset. Doing examinations and assignments have proved to be an uphill task for many students. In the current academic setup, many students have started intentionally or unintentionally reproducing work that had been produced by another person. These students do not attribute their written content to the source, and they submit it to their tutors in an attempt to achieve an academic benefit. It is required that in natural language assignments, students should acknowledge the authorship and the source of the material which they are not the original authors. This paper seeks to illustrate the top ten methods of preventing duplication (Desena).
It is easy to have an assumption that students are aware of what constitutes to plagiarism, which is not always the ideal case. Some students have not written sufficient assignments to comprehend what plagiarism is. Students have been known to rearrange phrases and reorder tenses. It is paramount to talk with students before any plagiarism incident. Tutors should advise students on writing skills that constitute plagiarism. Another method that can be used to prevent plagiarism is the ability to transform private perspectives into original phrases. Reliance on other people's words leads to focus on publishing instead of writing well, which leads to lack of expertise to articulate (Lathrop and Foss).
Writing from a strong ethical base is depends on honesty. This leads to the absence of fabricated text from an article. Credible writing comes about when there is reconciliation between the written word and making that word legitimate. However, having a strong ethical base is a result of continuous reinforcement and is thus a learned behavior. Teaching staff needs to be upfront with learners about the repercussions they will face in case plagiarism is detected in their assignments (Desena). At orientation, students should be told that plagiarism is not tolerated. The tutors should not be sympathetic and should use the perpetrators as examples. Teachers should warn, even if it means through threat of pursuance of suspension. After students see that these consequences are functional, they will do everything to make sure they do not submit unoriginal work.
According to Lampert, planning gives enough time for every activity in which students engage. It is essential for students to get on the right track at the new stages of a semester by noting all the deadlines for papers, assignments, and exams. Students should be engaged in a consistent study schedule for the entire period, and should try keeping ahead of their work. Advance planning allows for minimum effort in doing assignments without the pressure of copy pasting and paraphrasing (Desena).
When preparing papers, students should list the books used carefully. They should know the page numbers, authors, and publication dates. They should avoid getting information from the internet directly inter their own documents. They should attribute unoriginal content in the paper by use of quotation marks, and footnotes. They are supposed to cite using the required citation method. Students should follow instructions given to them by tutors. Students should seriously consider the guidelines set by the teachers. They are not likely to arouse suspicion regarding the originality of their work if they follow the set guidelines to the letter. This entails instructions given in the exam period (McCabe).
At times, plagiarism may happen unintentionally. It is necessary to use plagiarism detector software to make sure that one is on the safe side. However, it should not go to these extremes. Students should not avoid plagiarism because of the rules and the severe consequences if caught having submitted unoriginal academic materials. They should avoid plagiarism because it is a right thing to do, and the result is self-confidence for giving personal intellect a chance (Lampert).
According to Robertson, fabricators usually invent the unusual. It is crucial for students to review their personal writing by assuming they are skeptics of their own work. This involves questioning every aspect and piece of paper. It avails the ability to trace the sources of data used to write the article. This shows that the writer stuck to reality. The advancements in technology have made it simpler to collect and duplicate information into the required document. This information may be differing as the students copy from different sources that have different motives. Students should take time to determine the reliability of every source evaluate the authenticity of the points used in developing the discussion. It is vital for them to compare themes that re-emerge in other credible materials (Lathrop and Foss).
References
Desena, L. H. Preventing Plagiarism: Tips and Techniques. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. Guiding Students from Cheating and Plagiarism to Honesty and Integrity: Strategies for Change. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Lampert, L. D. Combating Student Plagiarism: An Academic Librarians Guide. Oxford: Chandos Publishers.
McCabe, D.L. Promoting Academic Integrity. Cedar City: Southern Utah University.
It is easy to have an assumption that students are aware of what constitutes to plagiarism, which is not always the ideal case. Some students have not written sufficient assignments to comprehend what plagiarism is. Students have been known to rearrange phrases and reorder tenses. It is paramount to talk with students before any plagiarism incident. Tutors should advise students on writing skills that constitute plagiarism. Another method that can be used to prevent plagiarism is the ability to transform private perspectives into original phrases. Reliance on other people's words leads to focus on publishing instead of writing well, which leads to lack of expertise to articulate (Lathrop and Foss).Writing from a strong ethical base is depends on honesty. This leads to the absence of fabricated text from an article. Credible writing comes about when there is reconciliation between the written word and making that word legitimate. However, having a strong ethical base is a result of continuous reinforcement and is thus a learned behavior. Teaching staff needs to be upfront with learners about the repercussions they will face in case plagiarism is detected in their assignments (Desena). At orientation, students should be told that plagiarism is not tolerated. The tutors should not be sympathetic and should use the perpetrators as examples. Teachers should warn, even if it means through threat of pursuance of suspension. After students see that these consequences are functional, they will do everything to make sure they do not submit unoriginal work.
According to Lampert, planning gives enough time for every activity in which students engage. It is essential for students to get on the right track at the new stages of a semester by noting all the deadlines for papers, assignments, and exams. Students should be engaged in a consistent study schedule for the entire period, and should try keeping ahead of their work. Advance planning allows for minimum effort in doing assignments without the pressure of copy pasting and paraphrasing (Desena).
When preparing papers, students should list the books used carefully. They should know the page numbers, authors, and publication dates. They should avoid getting information from the internet directly inter their own documents. They should attribute unoriginal content in the paper by use of quotation marks, and footnotes. They are supposed to cite using the required citation method. Students should follow instructions given to them by tutors. Students should seriously consider the guidelines set by the teachers. They are not likely to arouse suspicion regarding the originality of their work if they follow the set guidelines to the letter. This entails instructions given in the exam period (McCabe).
At times, plagiarism may happen unintentionally. It is necessary to use plagiarism detector software to make sure that one is on the safe side. However, it should not go to these extremes. Students should not avoid plagiarism because of the rules and the severe consequences if caught having submitted unoriginal academic materials. They should avoid plagiarism because it is a right thing to do, and the result is self-confidence for giving personal intellect a chance (Lampert).
According to Robertson, fabricators usually invent the unusual. It is crucial for students to review their personal writing by assuming they are skeptics of their own work. This involves questioning every aspect and piece of paper. It avails the ability to trace the sources of data used to write the article. This shows that the writer stuck to reality. The advancements in technology have made it simpler to collect and duplicate information into the required document. This information may be differing as the students copy from different sources that have different motives. Students should take time to determine the reliability of every source evaluate the authenticity of the points used in developing the discussion. It is vital for them to compare themes that re-emerge in other credible materials (Lathrop and Foss).
References
Desena, L. H. Preventing Plagiarism: Tips and Techniques. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. Guiding Students from Cheating and Plagiarism to Honesty and Integrity: Strategies for Change. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Lampert, L. D. Combating Student Plagiarism: An Academic Librarians Guide. Oxford: Chandos Publishers.
McCabe, D.L. Promoting Academic Integrity. Cedar City: Southern Utah University.